Mount Pleasant Crescent, Islington
Sold-price history and street data for Mount Pleasant Crescent in Islington — every sale sourced to HM Land Registry, free from Acreright.
Median £279,25020 sold sales since 1999Latest Dec 2025
Homes sold here: 19 flats · 1 other.
Full Islington area report → — prices, schools, crime, transport and more.
Sold prices
| Date | Address | Type | Tenure | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 2025 | 3 - 5 MOUNT PLEASANT CRESCENT | Flat | Leasehold | £440,000 |
| Apr 2022 | 3 - 5 MOUNT PLEASANT CRESCENT | Flat | Leasehold | £565,000 |
| Dec 2020 | 3 - 5 MOUNT PLEASANT CRESCENT | Other | Freehold | £25,000 |
| May 2020 | 3 - 5 MOUNT PLEASANT CRESCENT | Flat | Leasehold | £420,000 |
| Feb 2020 | 3 MOUNT PLEASANT CRESCENT | Flat | Leasehold | £415,000 |
| Feb 2018 | 3 - 5 MOUNT PLEASANT CRESCENT | Flat | Leasehold | £390,000 |
| Jan 2016 | 7a Mount Pleasant Crescent | Flat | Leasehold | £475,000 |
| Dec 2013 | 3 - 5 MOUNT PLEASANT CRESCENT | Flat | Leasehold | £385,000 |
| Jul 2013 | 3 - 5 MOUNT PLEASANT CRESCENT | Flat | Leasehold | £272,500 |
| Apr 2013 | 3 - 5 MOUNT PLEASANT CRESCENT | Flat | Leasehold | £300,000 |
| Dec 2006 | 3 - 5 MOUNT PLEASANT CRESCENT | Flat | Leasehold | £224,995 |
| Mar 2006 | 3 - 5 MOUNT PLEASANT CRESCENT | Flat | Leasehold | £230,000 |
| Jun 2005 | 7B MOUNT PLEASANT CRESCENT | Flat | Leasehold | £286,000 |
| May 2002 | 5b Mount Pleasant Crescent | Flat | Leasehold | £165,000 |
| Apr 2000 | 5b Mount Pleasant Crescent | Flat | Leasehold | £140,000 |
| Feb 2000 | FLAT 3B 3-5 MOUNT PLEASANT CRESCENT | Flat | Leasehold | £120,000 |
| Dec 1999 | 3 - 5 MOUNT PLEASANT CRESCENT | Flat | Leasehold | £120,000 |
| Nov 1999 | 3 - 5 MOUNT PLEASANT CRESCENT | Flat | Leasehold | £120,000 |
| Nov 1999 | 3 - 5 MOUNT PLEASANT CRESCENT | Flat | Leasehold | £150,000 |
HM Land Registry Price Paid · updated Jul 2026. Prices are nominal. “·B” marks a Land Registry category-B transfer (may not reflect full market value).
Has it held its value?
One home on Mount Pleasant Crescent sold twice in the records — too few (1) to quote a reliable loss rate, so we show the count, not a percentage. How this is measured.