Oak Lane, Barnet
Sold-price history and street data for Oak Lane in Barnet — every sale sourced to HM Land Registry, free from Acreright.
Median £222,50012 sold sales since 1995Latest Apr 2026
Homes sold here: 7 flats · 3 semi-detached · 2 terraced.
Full Barnet area report → — prices, schools, crime, transport and more.
Sold prices
| Date | Address | Type | Tenure | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 2025 | 20 Cool Oak Lane ·B | Semi-detached | Freehold | £485,000 |
| Mar 2023 | 49 Cool Oak Lane ·B | Semi-detached | Freehold | £470,000 |
| Mar 2020 | 6 OAK LANE EAST FINCHLEY LONDON ·B | Terraced | Freehold | £646,000 |
| Oct 2018 | 14, Cool Oak Lane | Semi-detached | Freehold | £550,000 |
| Sep 2018 | 43 Cool Oak Lane | Semi-detached | Freehold | £450,000 |
| Nov 2017 | 28, Cool Oak Lane | Semi-detached | Freehold | £625,000 |
| Jan 2016 | 47 Cool Oak Lane | Semi-detached | Freehold | £445,000 |
| Oct 2015 | 26, Cool Oak Lane | Semi-detached | Freehold | £485,000 |
| Dec 2012 | 61 Cool Oak Lane | Semi-detached | Freehold | £390,000 |
| Nov 2010 | 2 OAK LANE | Flat | Leasehold | £240,000 |
| Apr 2009 | 4 OAK LANE | Flat | Leasehold | £193,500 |
| May 2007 | 3 OAK LANE | Flat | Leasehold | £240,000 |
| Jul 2006 | 41 Cool Oak Lane | Semi-detached | Freehold | £263,500 |
| Jun 2006 | 10, Cool Oak Lane | Semi-detached | Freehold | £261,000 |
| May 2006 | 2 OAK LANE | Flat | Leasehold | £205,000 |
| Oct 2005 | 1 OAK LANE | Semi-detached | Freehold | £347,500 |
| Nov 2003 | 26, Cool Oak Lane | Semi-detached | Freehold | £250,000 |
| Jul 2002 | 5 OAK LANE | Semi-detached | Freehold | £285,000 |
| May 2002 | 2 OAK LANE | Flat | Leasehold | £140,000 |
| Dec 1997 | 3 OAK LANE | Terraced | Freehold | £64,500 |
| Aug 1996 | 1 OAK LANE | Semi-detached | Freehold | £115,000 |
| Aug 1995 | 4 OAK LANE | Flat | Leasehold | £42,000 |
HM Land Registry Price Paid · updated Jul 2026. Prices are nominal. “·B” marks a Land Registry category-B transfer (may not reflect full market value).
Has it held its value?
One home on Oak Lane sold twice in the records — too few (1) to quote a reliable loss rate, so we show the count, not a percentage. How this is measured.